The Rebranding of the Lottery


The lottery live draw sidney is a gambling game where people pay money to enter a drawing for a chance to win a prize. Prizes can include cash, goods, services, or even houses and cars. In the United States, the lottery contributes billions of dollars annually to state coffers. Some players play for fun while others believe that winning the lottery is their only or best chance at a better life. Whatever the reason, the fact is that most players know the odds of winning are poor.

The casting of lots to make decisions and to determine fates has a long history (indeed, the Bible contains several examples) but lotteries for material gain are more recent in origin. The first public lotteries appeared in the Low Countries in the 15th century, to raise money for town fortifications and other projects. They were wildly popular and were hailed as a painless form of taxation.

In colonial America, lotteries were used to finance a variety of works, including paving streets and constructing wharves, and they also financed colleges and churches. Benjamin Franklin sponsored a lottery in 1776 to raise money for cannons to defend Philadelphia against the British. George Washington sponsored a lottery in 1768 to raise funds for the construction of a road across the Blue Ridge Mountains.

These were essentially public service lotteries, and the message that they were sending to citizens was that it is a civic duty to participate in them. It is an idea that has since been superseded by the message that the lottery is a wonderful thing because it raises money for the state and, implicitly, makes everyone who plays rich.

This rebranding of the lottery has obscured its true nature. It is a regressive tax that falls heavily on the working and middle classes, and it is not a panacea for all of society’s problems. Lotteries have raised significant amounts of money for state governments, but they are not nearly enough to cover all of the costs of the social safety net.

The rebranding has made it more difficult to convey the fact that the odds of winning are very poor. In addition, the message that it is a “civic duty” to play has obscured how much of our income is being spent on tickets.

If we are going to keep lotteries around, it’s time to change the way we talk about them. We need to acknowledge that they are regressive and talk about how the money they raise is used in the context of overall state revenue. Then we can have honest conversations about whether or not they are worth continuing. We need to do that so that we can put the issue in perspective. If we don’t, we may end up with a system that isn’t worth running. And that would be a shame. This article was originally published in January 20, 2019. Copyright 2019 by The Atlantic. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission by the publisher.

Posted in: Gambling